translate a vector by another vector

$\begingroup$

let $T_A:\mathbb R^n\to \mathbb R^n$, and $A$ is vector in $\mathbb R^n$ such that $$T_A(X)=X+A$$$T_A$ is called the translation by $A$, but I don't understand why we call this mapping a translation, because if you add a vector $X$ to another vector $A$ you will get a new vector, not the translation of $A$, if $X+A$ is the translation of $X$ then we get that $$\mid \mid X+A\mid \mid = \mid \mid X \mid \mid$$Which is not true unless $A=O$.

In this picture, let $A=(1,1)$ and $X=(5,2)$, and you can see the diffrence between adding the vector $X+A=C$ and translating $X$ by $A$

$\endgroup$ 8

2 Answers

$\begingroup$

You are confusing two ways of thinking about a "vector". One is that it's an arrow starting at the origin. The other is that it's just an $n$-tuple of coordinates - that is, a point in $n$-space.

The map you describe translates points in space, each the same way determined by $A$. In your picture that's diagonally up and right by a distance $\sqrt{2}$.

It's often useful (particularly in physics) to think of a vector as an arrow. It's just not right in this context.

$\endgroup$ 2 $\begingroup$

Think of $X$ as a point in space. Then $X + A$ is precisely the result of translating $X$ by $A$ (thought of as a vector in the sense that you are thinking of them).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like